Monday, March 26, 2012
looping through query result column and PRINT to log file....
Basically I need know how I would get the list, and I am using PRINT command... I need to somehow write a loop that works through the list and PRINTS to the file...
Thanks in advanceI got it :)
For any1 who might be interested heres how its done
DECLARE @.NbrList VarChar(300)
SELECT @.NbrList = COALESCE(@.NbrList + ', ', '') + CAST(Invoice AS varchar(30))
from TRANSACTIONS where ProductID = 'CVSDBN'
PRINT @.NbrList
Thanks ;)sql
Monday, March 19, 2012
Lookup value for a field?
main table is storing the selected.value of the combo box, but the combo box
is displaying the "Name" column.
How do I display the "Name" column value on a report for a field instead of
the integer value of the row?
Thanks.If you look at the different options in the parameter creation window, it's
pretty straightforward.
1) While on the "Data" tab, go to "Report | Report Parameters" in the menu.
2) Click on "Add".
3) Give a meaningful name to your parameter (other than
"Report_Parameter_0")
4) Select a datatype (string, int, etc.). In your case, this would be int.
5) Type a prompt for your parameter (this will appear to the left of your
parameter combobox in the browser).
6) In the "Available Values" section, select "From Query"
7) Select the dataset you will use for your parameter values (typically a
separate dataset from the report's main dataset).
8) Put your key field (the integer value) in the "Value Field" drop down.
9) Preview, Rebuild or redeploy your report and voilà!
HTH,
Alain
"Brooke" <tbrooked@.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23dSGgzfrHHA.5024@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> Using VS2005 and creating reports. GUI has combo boxes with lookups. The
> main table is storing the selected.value of the combo box, but the combo
> box is displaying the "Name" column.
> How do I display the "Name" column value on a report for a field instead
> of the integer value of the row?
> Thanks.
>
Lookup Transformation
shafiqm wrote:
Is there a way to ignore the unmatched rows using Lookup without creating another destination (Error Transformation for red connector)?
Yes, Just use 'Ignore failure' in the error output...the unmatched rows will go into the green output having null in the looup columns
|||Rafael Salas wrote:
shafiqm wrote: Is there a way to ignore the unmatched rows using Lookup without creating another destination (Error Transformation for red connector)?
Yes, Just use 'Ignore failure' in the error output...the unmatched rows will go into the green output having null in the looup columns
And if you truly need to ignore the error (unmatched records) then use the red flow and add it to a row counter. That way, you can capture the number of rows and they'll end up being separated from the valid records.
Monday, March 12, 2012
Lookup fields in SQL Server
I am new to using SQL Server and need some help creating lookup fields if it is possible.
I use the lookup wizard to create lookup fields in access. Can you do the same in SQL?
I have successfully created relationships in SQL but I want to lookup the related fields during data entry like in Access with a dropdown box with the available options.
You would have to write the code to populate the box, but it works the same in access. In fact, you can use access as a front-end to SQL Server tables. Create the tables in SQL Server, open an access project, and connect to the database, linking the tables in to access. Then build everything in Access just like you always have.
You can also use any other application, like Visual Basic or Web pages to create the same thing, but you'll need to learn one of those languages to do so.
Buck Woody
Lookup fields in SQL Server
I am new to using SQL Server and need some help creating lookup fields if it is possible.
I use the lookup wizard to create lookup fields in access. Can you do the same in SQL?
I have successfully created relationships in SQL but I want to lookup the related fields during data entry like in Access with a dropdown box with the available options.
You would have to write the code to populate the box, but it works the same in access. In fact, you can use access as a front-end to SQL Server tables. Create the tables in SQL Server, open an access project, and connect to the database, linking the tables in to access. Then build everything in Access just like you always have.
You can also use any other application, like Visual Basic or Web pages to create the same thing, but you'll need to learn one of those languages to do so.
Buck Woody
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Looking for method to create stem and leaf graph
I would appreciate any advice anyone might have to offer on how to approach creating a stem-and-leaf graph using t-sql. My table structure is as follows:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Responses](
[appraisalId] [char](9) NOT NULL,
[userId] [char](9) NOT NULL,
[res1] [decimal](5, 2) NOT NULL,
[res2] [decimal](5, 2) NOT NULL,
[res3] [decimal](5, 3) NOT NULL,
[res4] [decimal](5, 2) NOT NULL,
[res5] [decimal](5, 2) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Responses] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[appraisalId] ASC,
[userId] ASC
))
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Responses] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CK_Responses_res1] CHECK (([res1]>=(1) AND [res1]<=(5)))
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Responses] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CK_Responses_res2] CHECK (([res2]>=(1) AND [res2]<=(5)))
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Responses] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CK_Responses_res3] CHECK (([res3]>=(1) AND [res3]<=(5)))
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Responses] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CK_Responses_res4] CHECK (([res4]>=(1) AND [res4]<=(5)))
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Responses] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CK_Responses_res5] CHECK (([res5]>=(1) AND [res5]<=(5)))
The problem to be solved is to create a stem and leaf graph that shows for each response value column res1 to res5, with valid values 1.0 - 5.0, create a graph similar to the following:
5|11233445567789
4|12233445566789
3|11334556667789
2|11223444567889
1|12233345556778
It was my hope that I could do this using reporting services, but I'll almost settle for being able to produce a two column result set similar to the above.
Best,
Steven
Please post some sample data (input) & expected sample output data.
It will help us to understand the problem quickly.. ![]()
I was playing around with a stacked bar chart, and experimented with a custom fill, and wound up with something that actually looks quite like what I wanted.
Thanks for the assist!
Best,
B.
Looking for method to create stem and leaf graph
I would appreciate any advice anyone might have to offer on how to approach creating a stem-and-leaf graph using t-sql. My table structure is as follows:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Responses](
[appraisalId] [char](9) NOT NULL,
[userId] [char](9) NOT NULL,
[res1] [decimal](5, 2) NOT NULL,
[res2] [decimal](5, 2) NOT NULL,
[res3] [decimal](5, 3) NOT NULL,
[res4] [decimal](5, 2) NOT NULL,
[res5] [decimal](5, 2) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Responses] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[appraisalId] ASC,
[userId] ASC
))
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Responses] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CK_Responses_res1] CHECK (([res1]>=(1) AND [res1]<=(5)))
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Responses] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CK_Responses_res2] CHECK (([res2]>=(1) AND [res2]<=(5)))
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Responses] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CK_Responses_res3] CHECK (([res3]>=(1) AND [res3]<=(5)))
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Responses] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CK_Responses_res4] CHECK (([res4]>=(1) AND [res4]<=(5)))
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Responses] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CK_Responses_res5] CHECK (([res5]>=(1) AND [res5]<=(5)))
The problem to be solved is to create a stem and leaf graph that shows for each response value column res1 to res5, with valid values 1.0 - 5.0, create a graph similar to the following:
5|11233445567789
4|12233445566789
3|11334556667789
2|11223444567889
1|12233345556778
It was my hope that I could do this using reporting services, but I'll almost settle for being able to produce a two column result set similar to the above.
Best,
Steven
Please post some sample data (input) & expected sample output data.
It will help us to understand the problem quickly.. ![]()
I was playing around with a stacked bar chart, and experimented with a custom fill, and wound up with something that actually looks quite like what I wanted.
Thanks for the assist!
Best,
B.